Tomorrow, leaders
throughout Asia and the Pacific Rim, including the United States, will congregate in Vladivostok
to take part the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit. In an article
President Putin wrote for The Wall Street Journal Asian Edition he states, “Membership
in the WTO gives us the ability to participate more broadly in setting the
global trade rules—an issue that has been a focus of attention for APEC in the
past. I am confident that Russia's fresh outlook on the objective difficulties
and internal contradictions of the WTO will be useful.” Induction to the WTO is
certainly a major milestone for free trade globally but questions remain as to
what it means for the world’s ninth largest economy and the global community. I
will begin to examine this issue by laying out a brief history, structure and legal
framework of the organization.
The World Trade Organization stems from
economic multilateral agreements set forth in the General Agreement on Trade
and Tariffs (GATT). The agreement drafted in Geneva in 1947 to provide rules
for world trade and to create a third institution from the “Bretton Woods” institution.
Its role was to handle trade aspects of international economic cooperation. The
agreement is designed to provide, as much as possible, a systemic flow of
international commerce. By the 1980’s the world economy had outgrown the agreement
and the Uruguay rounds begin the formulation of what is now the WTO. The
organization launched in 1995.
The preamble of the WTO states that its
purpose is to raise the world standard of living and expand the production of
trade in goods and services. Simultaneously the agreement recognizes the need to
use the world’s resources in an optimal manner with the objective of
sustainable development as well as protection of the environment. Article II of
the agreement writes that the WTO will provide an institutional framework for conducting
trade between its members in subjects related to agreements. Upon ratification
or accession, each government will be bound to the 18 agreements and legal
instruments entitled the Multilateral Trade Agreements (MTA). Of these agreements,
the one that perhaps most exciting to prospective foreign investors to Russia
is the Trade Policy Review Mechanism (TPRM). This provides enhanced transparency
involving the trade practices of member governments.
The process of accession, which took
Russia 18years, involves a two-step process. First, a perspective member must
negotiate bilaterally and make concessions with each WTO member that seeks to
do so. The bilateral agreements do not have to be identical as different nations
have various interests. Second, the prospective member must negotiate with all
the WTO members in their joint capacity. This process evaluates the applicants’
current trade regime and the current minimum requirements of the WTO and GATT.
At this point, the nation may want to request a developing or least developed economy
status, as China did.
The WTO performs various functions, among
them is overseeing, implementing as well as the operation of the agreement. It
also provides a forum for dispute resolution. One crucial element that is
currently stalling the potential benefits of US-Russia trade is the Most
Favored Nation (MNF) rule. This requires WTO members to treat one another
equally. Currently, US. legislation entitled the Jackson-Vanik amendment places
restrictions on Russia due to cold war human rights violations. This means that
the Russian government is free to discriminate against American suppliers. This
puts US companies at a disadvantage to its European and Asian counterparts. Repeal
of the amendment is required for Russia’s WTO membership to be of any benefit
to US businesses and its economy.
Russia WTO membership will undoubtedly
reap prosperity for itself and the global economy but its potential
externalities are yet to be determined. This weekend’s summit in Vladivostok
will provide Putin and other member a forum to discuss and consider the realities
of this major and complex international development. Only time will tell how
this will shift the world’s political and economic landscape.
Sources referred
to in this post:
International
Trade Law: Interdisciplinary Theory and Practice, 3rd edition. Raj
Bahala
International
Law, 6th edition. Mark Weston Janis.
Vladimir Putin: “An
Asia-Pacific Growth Agenda” http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443847404577629312716242648.html
“Understanding
the WTO”
Dina Gusovsky: “Russia
joins the WTO: Now what for U.S.-Russia trade relations?”
http://www.examiner.com/article/russia-joins-the-wto-now-what-for-u-s-russia-trade-relations
Nice post, but you might want to examine the arguments of those on Russia’s far right/left who claim that Russia’s accession to the WTO will only end up hurting the country. For a good example of this type of thinking, check out the blogs at the links below:
ReplyDeletehttp://nstarikov.livejournal.com/702291.html
http://korobok12.livejournal.com/252959.html
Thanks for your input. I intend to evaluate the effects accession will have on specific economic sectors in later posts.
ReplyDelete