Ideological Factors in Human Trafficking
I would like to
expand on an interesting, and previously unknown to me, facet that I mentioned
last week in my broad overview of human trafficking in Central Asia.
Sulaimanova mentions that many women lured into pursuing these risky opportunities
that take them abroad, and ultimately trap them within a trafficking ring, had
an “idealistic view of life in wealthier countries that encourages victims to
be lured abroad” (Sulaimanova, 2004). Across the literature I have come across
similar occurrences. Women struggling economically are looking for any
opportunity to provide for themselves and their families, which already makes
them highly vulnerable. This is further compounded by an inaccurate perception
of wealthier countries as utopias where they can accept offered work as
waitresses, dancers, models, etc. without fear of harassment or abuse.
It is crucial to
remember that most victims are lured abroad by traffickers voluntarily, not
kidnapped. I mentioned many of the methods used by traffickers in my last post.
Victims saw an opportunity and they took it. Although most understand what is
expected of certain professions, they do not understand the exploitation and
violence that they will experience. An official from Inter-Pol Ukraine “estimated
that 75 percent of the women do not realize they will be forced into
prostitution” (Hughes, 2000). This reveals a significant percentage of women
who do go abroad knowing that they will expected to be prostitutes. However,
their expectations are still widely inaccurate. Several articles mention a
woman who went abroad with the understanding she would prostitute, who went
willingly because she thought it would be similar to the film “Pretty Woman”
with a man supporting her (Hughes, 2000; Sulaimanova, 2004). The “romanticizing”
of prostitution is not exclusive to Hollywood; the Russian media, TV, and film
industry have portrayed the “carefree and prosperous” life of elite prostitutes
in Moscow in the late 1980s in movies such as “Interdevochka” in 1989. The
influence such exposure may have had was reflected in two public opinion polls
conducted among girls in high school in 1989, where prostitution “made the top
ten of the most prestigious and desirable professions” (Tverdova, 2011).
In Russia and Central
Asia, the idealistic picture many of those in desperate economic situations have
of these professions abroad is not only supported by movies, but also through
tales told by those who have worked in those professions and returned. These
second-hand accounts may be the only information potential victims receive if
they are in areas that are educationally underserved and inadequately connected
to the communication tools we rely on to check facts and obtain reliable information.
Naturally, these stories are embellished and highly inaccurate. A method used
by traffickers to recruit additional women is to send a “Second Wave” of
previously trafficked women home to spread glamorous tales and entice new women
abroad. Recruiting replacements is often the only option victims have of
escaping traffickers, or victimized women see an opportunity to profit from the
system that took advantage of them (Sulaimanova, 2004). An account exemplifying
this was given by a Ukrainian woman recruited by a friend who had told her she
would earn US$2,000 a month at a club in the Netherlands where prostitution was
optional, which turned out to be far from the case (Hughes, 2000).
An additional aspect
that should be taken into consideration are the sociological factors that can
influence the susceptibility of women to trafficking. Their low social status in
Central Asia has both obvious economic implications for women (increased job
discrimination, lower relative income, and higher unemployment) and social
implications. In the patriarchal societies of the region, domestic violence
against women is an additional problem that pushes many young women to run
away, and additionally, if they are pulled into a trafficking ring, being
mistreated as an “inferior human being” only “confirms their worst fears”
(Sulaimanova, 2004). Lower social status also carries with it the decreased
likelihood of sympathy from the police or immigration officials that is
compounded by complicity and corruption. Trafficked women in the region tend to
distrust the authorities because they have been both prosecuted by them and witnessed
their collusion with traffickers (Tverdova, 2011). Moreover, the predominantly
Muslim societies within Central Asia view it “as almost taboo to openly discuss
the trafficking of women for prostitution,” which aids stigmatization and
discourages efforts at enforcement (Jackson, 2005).
All of these
factors aid in the deception that is a key tool used by human traffickers to
first locate potential victims, and then to persuade them to come abroad. Even
if they are able to return home, victims are often shunned by family and
friends not only because they are now seen as shameful, but also because many
are accused of volunteering. While many
victims do enter into these schemes willingly, they do so under false
pretenses.
Hughes,
Donna M. 2000. “The “Natasha” Trade: The Transnational Shadow Market of
Trafficking in Women.” Journal of International Affairs, Spring 2000.
Available at: http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/natasha.htm
Jackson,
Nicole J. 2005. “The Trafficking Of Narcotics, Arms and Humans in Postsoviet
Central Asia: (Mis)Perceptions, Policies And Realities,” Central Asian
Survey, 24:1, 39-52.
Sulaimanova,
Saltanat. 2004. “Migration Trends in Central Asia and the Case of Trafficking
of Women,” in In the Tracks of Tamerlane: Central Asia’s Path to the 21st
Century, eds. Dan Burghart and Theresa Sabonis-Helf. Washington, D.C.:
National Defense University, Center for Technology and National Security
Policy, 377- 400. Available online
Tverdova,
Yuliya. 2011. “Human Trafficking in Russia and Other Post-Soviet States.” Human
Rights Review 12(3): 329-344.
No comments:
Post a Comment