This blog is designed to capture research efforts by students selected to participate in the CREES-FMSO internship.
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Book Review: How Russia Shaped the Modern World
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Eurasian News This Week
Serbia and the EU
Due to lacking progress regarding conclusive dialogue between Belgrade and Priština, the starting date for negotiations will be pushed back while the EU commission recommended that Serbia be given candidate status for EU membership. Definite decisions, however, will be made in December. Membership, to be sure, will be l tied to the clear progress regarding Belgrade – Priština relations. Specifically, improved relations between Belgrade and Priština entail regional cooperation and would subsequently lead to greater regional stability. According to a Beta article, it is clear that a prevailing number of EU member states would prefer to see a considerable improvement between Serbia and Kosovo prior to Belgrade’s accession to the EU. Yet, not a single state has explicitly stipulated that Serbia recognize Kosovo’s independence possibly because five EU member states have not done so either. These states include Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Spain, and Slovakia. Germany and France, meanwhile, are the strongest proponents of tightening the concession date of negotiations as well as Serbia’s candidacy for EU membership should Belgrade – Priština relations not improve significantly. On the other side, the European Commission highlighted Serbian results in reforming its judiciary, systemic law and the fight against corruption.
Vice president Božidar Đelić stated that “some countries” do not wish for Serbia to receive EU membership. “The reality is that these states seek to convince other member states that Serbia meet additional conditions” as Đelić maintained in an interview with Press Online. The vice president asserted that additional conditions may be placed on Serbia as long as these do not overstep the state’s “red lines” regarding Belgrade’s policy toward Kosovo. He added, however, that France was working on Serbia’s behalf so that no extra conditions would be placed prior to Serbia’s admission to the Union. Đelić too said that Serbia, to date, had brought forward creative solutions regarding the Kosovo issue adding that the next move was to come from the EU. Đelić, for instance, expects the EU’s help regarding the achievement of solutions for customs which in turn would ease further dialogue with Priština. For now, diplomatic protocol will determine as to the allowable goods carried across the administrative points.
According to Nenad Čanak, president of the League of the Social Democrats of Vojvodina (LSV), the overall messages coming out of Brussels look positive. Other politicians, meanwhile, remain conscious. Serbia’s Renewal Movement Party (SPO) president Vuk Drašković, for instance, warned that while positive recommendations regarding EU membership are constructive, they could be reversed still. EU membership can be lost if Serbia does not establish regional membership cooperation, an important goal too for Serbia. In addition, receiving EU membership will not solve Serbia’s most pressing problems as Tomislav Nikolić, president of Serbia’s Progressive Party (SNS), asserted. According to Nikolić, these problems include a deficient economy and the low living standard of Serbian citizens. In Nikolić’s words “only a completely new government will be able to resolve these problems”.
Reacting to the EU commission’s recommendation, Serbian president Boris Tadić expressed his satisfaction adding that Serbia is ready to continue its dialogue with Priština as was conditioned by the Commission. EU candidacy would present Serbia with economic opportunities especially regarding possible investments that could potentially flow into the state. Tadić emphasized that accession would send a positive signal to Serbian citizens that their state is on the right track affirming that positive attitude is important while simultaneously cautioning from too much euphoria.
“EK preporučila kandidaturu za Srbiju”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 12, 2011. www.egm.rs/vesti/srbija/166127.html
“EU: Srbija sutra kandidat za prijem, datum pregovora kasnije”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 11, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/166042.html
“Reakcije na dobijanje kandidature”. B 92. accessed October 12, 2011. www.B92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2011&mm=10&dd=12&nav_id=548940
“Đelić: Dijalog da, ali sa uslovima”. B92. accessed October 13, 2011.www.B92.net/info/vesti/indexphp?yyyy-2011&mm=10&dd=13&nav_id=549197
“Đelić: Pojedine Zemlje bi da postave nove uslove Srbiji”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 9, 2001. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165910.html
Serbia and Kosovo I Metohija
Serbia and Kosovo were to hold renewed debates on the 14th of October. Talks between Belgrade and Priština, however, were only to be held on technical issues as head of Kosovo’s delegation, deputy prime minister of Kosovo Edita Tahiri stated. Tahriri added that Serbia seeks to channel talks to include political issues particularly the administrative crossings in northern Kosovo. She recalled the U.S.’s and EU’s conception by which the nature of upcoming talks ought not to be changed contrary to Serbia’s request by which dialogue regarding the Jarinje and Brnjak crossings remain of principal importance ahead of questions regarding energy, telecommunications and regional cooperation.
State secretary at the Ministry for Kosovo Oliver Ivanović agreed with the Commission regarding the continuance of Priština – Belgrade dialogue. The problem is, according to Ivanović, that the EU does not have as great an influence in Kosovo compared to the U.S. For this reason, Serbia hopes that U.S. ambassador to Kosovo Christopher William Dell will influence Kosovo to return to hold dialogues with Serbia. Ivanović added that talks between Belgrade and Priština were always conducted “on the edge” as Kosovo diplomats seek to politicize talks so that continued dialogue will always hinge on Serbian recognition of Kosovo’s independence.
On the administrative crossing near Jarinje, Serb citizens and KFOR troops again collided over the removal of barriers erected by Serbs. KFOR troops, upon Serb citizen’s protest against the removal of the barricade, again closed the Jarinje crossing. The removal of the barricades, according to KFOR forces, was necessary so as to allow for normalized communication and supply to the Jarinje bases. Serbs, however, asserted they would remain on the barricades until Kosovar customs officials leave the administrative crossing. The barricades, however, are to be removed on Monday, October 17, 2011, said Ivanović upon information from KFOR. Ivanović added that such actions “will not lead to constructive results while it actually may raise tensions in the region”. Instead, the minister said, it is likely that upon a meeting planned between four municipalities (no specification) and KFOR an agreement will be reached regarding the movement of KFOR vehicles. The message from KFOR headquarters in Priština meanwhile remained unchanged. The barricades are to be removed under peaceful circumstances.
Former United Nations administrator to Kosovo Gerald Galucci stated that the Commission’s linking of Serbia’s membership to the situation in Kosovo meant in effect that Brussels is demanding that Serbia surrender the north of Kosovo to Priština. In an article published in the portal Transconflict, Galucci stipulated the removal of the barricades and the permanent placement of Kosovar customs officials in northern Kosovo. The five most influential players regarding Kosovo and Serbian relations, the U.S., Great Britain, France, Germany and Italy, expect from Serbia to relinquish its position in northern Kosovo. The problem, however, is that president Tadić cannot give up northern Kosovo on political bases. Tadić, for instance, lacks the necessary political support to withdraw from its position thereby making the fulfillment of EU demands impossible. In Galucci’s words, “the EU should have simply said that it currently does not wish to admit new member states”.
“Kfor ponovo zatvorio novi alternativni put kod jarinja”. Polika Online. accessed October 16, 2011. www.politika.rs/rubrke/Politika/Kfor-ponovo-zatvorio-novi-alternativni-put-kod-jarinja.lt.html
“Ivanović: Intervencija protiv Srba nije u interesu Kfora”. Politika Online. accessed October 16, 2011. www.politika.rs/rubrike/Politika/Ivanovic-Intervencija-protiv-Srba-nije-u-interesu-Kfora.lt.html
“Barikade ostaju, ali do kada?”. B92. accessed October 16, 2011. www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2011&mm=10&dd=16&nav_category=640&nav_id=549956
“Ivanović: Najava uklanjanja barikada jača napetost”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 16, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/166403.html
“Galuči: EU od Beograda traži predaju severa”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 13, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/166204.html
“KFOR zatvorio novi alternativni put kod Jarinja”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 13, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/166202.html
“Ivanocić: Potreban pritisak na Prištinu”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 13, 2011.www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/166200.html
“Sledeća runda razgovara o tehničkim pitanjima 14. octobra”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 9, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165909.html
Serbia
While elections are planned to be held in 2012, Serbia’s parliamentary speaker Slavica Đukić-Dejanović stated that she would not be surprised would elections be announced in December. Đukić-Dejanović added that the upcoming decision on Serbia’s accession, also due in December, might be positive thus influencing the date of the elections. It is already clear, especially during the past 30 days, that Serbia is in pre-election mode. However, deputy prime minister and minister for the interior Ivica Dačić announced that elections will be held as announced, in 2012. Yet, asked about Đukić-Dejanović’s statement, he concurred that elections may theoretically be held in December simultaneously asserting that elections “will definitely be regular”.
Similar words as mentioned above by Nikolić (SNS), were voiced by the president of the League of Social Democrats of Vojvodina (LSV) Nenad Čanak as he stated that “Belgradization is a great evil”. According to Čanak, the rest of Serbia cannot get better as long as all the money keeps flowing to Belgrade while Belgrade politicians receive the highest salary in the state. Serbia cannot emerge from its current [fiscal] crisis as long as the decision making process is being centralized. Executive powers should thus be transferred to municipalities. These and other questions including “the sweeping hordes of fascists on Belgrade streets who do not seem to be answerable to the law” remain unanswered, said Čanak adding that these should be banned and brought to justice. Inaction by the government has produced a counter reaction as a growing number of Hungarian nationalists become visible in Vojvodina also.
“Koalicija ne naša stvar”. Politika Online. accessed October 16, 2011. www.politika.rs/rubrike/Politika/Koalicija-je-nasa-stvar.lt.html
“Čanak: Beogradizacija je veliko zlo”. B92. accessed October 16, 2011. www.b92.net/biz/vesti/srbija.php.?yyyy=2011&mm=10&dd=16&nav_id=549883.
“Raspisovanje izbora u decembru?”. Ekonom East Media Group. accessed October 11, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/166022.html
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Eurasian News This Week
Serbia & the EU
Internal affairs minister Ivica Dačić affirmed Serbia’s continued priority regarding EU membership. While Belgrade’s prospect of economic progress is significant, shared values between the EU and Serbia are an equally essential determinant of joining. This he said at the opening of the economic summit in Belgrade adding that Serbia is committed to resolving pending problems while seeking to preserve its national interest. Energy development and economic cooperation should further integration and not serve as dividing factors in the region, stated Dačić at the summit that hosted 40 participants and 200 delegates. Central themes discussed at the summit included regional economic stability, EU accession, macroeconomic stability, development of the Serbian economy, structural change, foreign investment policies in agriculture, telecommunications, trade, energy and environmental protection. Meanwhile, Ištvan Pastor, president of the Hungarian alliance Vojvodina, stated that Serbia was not to receive EU candidacy as long as Belgrade not change its law on the restitution of property. The determination of the law, said Pastor, is a candidacy wager that influences Serbia’s accession as Hungry contemplates its position over the above question. Nevertheless, Serbia is looking toward accession to the Union. According to public statements made at the first regional conference with attendees from Albania, Bosnia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia, reforming the public administration sector is viewed as the focal priority on the road to EU accession. Good governance, for instance, is indicative of the quality of life as well as it is a key factor for economic competitiveness and growth as stated by Milan Marković, minister of human rights, public administration and local self governance. Marković stated that the quality regarding public services are at “the same” level throughout the region adding that the public sector, financed with taxes from the citizenry, ought to provide quality services and secure economic growth. The minister pointed toward the regions’ historic cooperation as well as “the terrible events of the past” emphasizing that finding renewed trust through cooperation will correct the difficulties experienced. This, Marković said, is the biggest challenge as well as it is a political priority of the regional governments. Governmental reform is but one step to cooperation as proven by states that have joined in 2004.
Serbian endeavor at reform is possibly paying off. Bečki Prese reported that Serbia has good chances regarding negotiation talks with the EU while negotiations on admission are not concrete. To be sure, the current situation in Kosovo nearly jeopardized Belgrade’s position, yet, Serbia, according to the report, has worked on reforming its judiciary as well as fighting corruption. The decisive act, however, was Ratko Mladić’s and Goran Hadžić’s capture and extradition to The Hague. These notions were affirmed by Milica Delević, the Serbian governments EU integration office director, adding that the EU is most likely to advocate a solution for northern Kosovo prior to Serbia’s admission.
“Milica Delević: Očekumem pozitivnu preporuku EK”. Politika Online. accessed October 8, 2011. www.politika.rs/rubrike/Politika/Milica-Delevic-Ocekujem-pozitivnu-preporuku-EK.lt.html
“Srbiji status kandidata?”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 7, 2011. www.emg.sr/vesti/srbija/165726.html
“Reforma uprave prioritet na putu ka EU i zahtev građana”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 6, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165669.html
“Pastor: Srbija bez candidature zbog zakona o restituciji”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 4, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165381.html
“Dačić: Članstvo u EU priorited Srbije”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 3, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165256.html
Serbia
Vice president of the progressive party (SNS) Aleksandar Vučić pronounced the current government of Serbia the “worst ruling body ever” given that it indebted the state by 5.7 billion Euros. There are no perspectives for the state while the fabrics remain closed. Yet the leading politicians, said Vučić, remain silent on these issues adding that on the 29th of October on which the SNS marks its third year of existence, the party will unveil its political, economical and social plan.
Turning to Serbia’s battle against corruption, Čedomir Čupić – member of the anti corruption board – stated that resolving “big” corruption scandals would send a clear message regarding Serbia’s intentions. When seeking to resolve corruption, cooperation between differing state institutions including efficiency regarding persecution at the courts is imperative. Čupić thus recalled unresolved scandals thus questioning the effectiveness of the judiciary. While the courts are thought of as independent, questions regarding the judges remain. To this end, said Čupić, the anti corruption committee should receive greater investigative and executive functions – a notion met with agreement by justice minister Slobodan Homen. The minister stated that it is not ruled out that the agency be entrusted with greater responsibility in the fight against corruption.
Regarding human rights, Serbia received positive feedback from the United Nations (UN). The UN has thus prepared a series of action so as to demonstrate to the international community that Serbia has become a state that pays attention to human rights as UN resident coordinator William Infante stated. According to Infante, Serbia can be proud to serve as a model for inter-parliamentary and mutual cooperation between institutions dealing with human rights at the “Human Rights and Parliament” conference at the Serbian parliament.
“Čupić: Rešavati krupne afere”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 4, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165432
“Vučić: Vlada zadužila zemlju za 5.7 milijardi evra”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 4, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165403
Serbia & Kosovo
Investigations regarding the events of late September are still under way. Koha Ditore, a Kosovar news outlet, reported that the attack on KFOR soldiers was planned by a businessman named Zvonko Vaselinović – the same man as reported to having organized the opening of alternative roads around the administrative crossings. Vaselinović, however, denied these, as well as allegations that tied him to illegal cigarette and oil trade. Koha quoted Erhard Drews, the new KFOR commander, who witnessed the attack on KFOR soldiers adding that 10 soldiers have been wounded. The toughest job, according to EULEX, was to get an exact number as to how many Serbs were injured. According to ongoing investigations, the incidents transpired when a truck headed toward the barbed wire surrounding the KFOR base. Against a soldiers warning, the truck did not stop instead colliding with a KFOR soldier whose weapons the truck driver sought to seize. Another KFOR soldier opened fire on the truck driver upon which Serbian citizens on the barricades started to throw explosive devices toward the KFOR base as Koha Ditore reported. A similar version of incidents was published by B92 quoting Vuk Drašković, head of the Serbian Renewal Movement Party (SPO), who affirmed that the same conclusions were presented at the parliamentary committee on security. Before this news release, representatives of Kosovar Serbs and the Ministry for Kosovo argued that KFOR soldiers opened fire on unarmed Serbs as well as the ambulance. However, state secretary for Kosovo Oliver Ivanović stated that he does not share Vuković’s views. Ivanović bases his knowledge on the incidents regarding the administrative crossing Jarinje on eyewitness accounts as well as on those Serbs who have been injured. According to these versions, a Serb drove a truck toward the KFOR base with the intention of burying the barbed wire that was put in place by KFOR soldiers. The barbed wire was erected with the intention of blocking the road near the Jarinje crossing. KFOR soldiers, meanwhile, sought to halt the truck driver. Upon the driver’s refusal to halt the truck, a KFOR soldier sought to pull the driver out of the truck which led to “a reaction” of the other Serbian people on the barricades leading to the KFOR solders’ opening of fire on advancing Serbs. Witnesses also claimed that both, rubber bullets as well as live ammunition were shot at the demonstrating crowd, according to the eyewitness account quoted by Ivanović.
Meanwhile, Serbians in northern Kosovo still guard the barricades according to a schedule citizens have established so as to secure continued presence in Kosovska Mitrovica, Zvečanu, Zubini Potok and Leposavica. The Serbian Kosovars on the Jarinje and Brnjak crossings stated that despite the changing weather conditions, they will not abandon the barricades until the Kosovar customs officers leave the administrative crossings. Present are, despite the start of the school year, students as well as pensioners among other people. Since closing the Jarinje crossing, there has not been a single car or pedestrian traversing the route despite the EULEX’s announcement by which the crossing was reopened.
The current situation in northern Kosovo meanwhile is affecting the economic sector of Serbia as German investments were halted allegedly over the development there. The German ambassador to Belgrade Wolfram Maas did not specify if in fact the “Kosovo crisis” led to the delay of investment. German investors, however, are following the development on the border closely. According to recent survey, a German pharmaceutical company lost 1.5 million Euros due to the prohibition of delivering goods from Serbia to Kosovo.
Tasić, Jelena. “Državnim organima Srbije sam na raspolaganju 24 sata dnevno”. Danas.sr. accessed October 7, 2011. www.danas.rs/danasrs/politika/drzavnim_organima_sam_na_raspolaganju_24_sata_dnevno.56.html?news_id=225410
“Kosovska kriza zaustavila nemačke investicije”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 5, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165551.html
“Koha: Napad na Kfor organizovao srpski biznismen”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 5, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165533.html
“Dežurstva na baricadama po rasporedu”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 4, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165404.html
Novi Pazar / Sandžak
Tomislav Nikolić, head of Serbia’s Progressive Party (SNS), stated upon a meeting with Muamer Effendi Zukorlić, Mufti of the Serbian Islamic community, that all Serb citizens are threatened, not only Bosniaks residing in Serbia. Nikolić asserted nobody living in Serbia could safely assume to be guaranteed a job, a perspective, education, medicinal treatment or a secure pension. He did not wish to get into the discussion as to whether Bosniaks were proportionally represented in courts or police forces simply adding that there is room for improvement. Nikolić stated that Zukorlić had to date plentifully proven that the rights of Bosniaks were jeapordized. “I join Zukorlić’s view and say the rights of Serbs are threatened too”, said the leading SNS politician. In response to the meeting, Zukorlić stated that only time will show as to whether Nikolić will prove himself to be a fair leader. The great injustices against the Islamic community and Bosniaks must thus be removed, an action by which Nikolić could demonstrate that he is different from the politicians that have been in power thus far. However, Nikolić’s statements demonstrate that there is no difference between the Serbian and Bosniak communities. The government, says Zukorlić, hitherto tried to portray his activism as a dividing factor contributing between an alleged gap between the respective communities. The meeting had other positive effects as explained by Zukorlić. People on the street, Serbs as well as Bosniaks, greet him on while he feels that citizens are happy about the discussion Nikolić and Zukorlić had. In the focus were five as of yet unresolved questions including the unification of the Islamic community, the return of confiscated territory to the Waqf (plot and/or buildings for religious and/or charitable purposes), accreditation of the International University, the allowance that the illegally excluded teachers be granted the right to resume their work as well lifting the ban on the Bosniak National Council.
“Nismo tražili savez sa Zukorlićem.” Politika Online. accessed October 8, 2011. www.politika.rs/rubrike/politika/Nismo-trazili-savez-sa-Zukorlicem.lt.html
“Intervju: Muamer Zukorlić, glavni muftija Islamske zajednice u Srbiji – Nikolić deluje doslednije od Tadića”. Politika Online. accessed October 8, 2011. www.politika.rs/rubrike/politika/Nikolic-deluje-doslednije-od-Tadica.lt.html
“Nikolić: U Srbiji zu ugroženi svi, ne samo Bošnjaci”. Ekonom East Group. accessed October 7, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165737.html
Sunday, October 2, 2011
Eurasian News This Week
According to a report produced by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), China's increasing global influence, its reduced dependence on the export of weapons from Russia and more alternative energy suppliers for China are making the country's strategic partnership with Russia problematic. While leaders of both countries play up the extent of their alliance and strategic ties, this partnership is unlikely to develop into anything more significant. In the coming years, while relations will remain close at the diplomatic level, the two cornerstones of the partnership over the past two decades -- military and energy cooperation -- are crumbling," the think-tank wrote. "As a result, Russia's significance to China will continue to diminish."
China-Russia-Belarus-Ukraine - Russia risks losing the markets of those countries which had always been considered as Russia's sphere of influence. China has an active economic expansion in Belarus and Ukraine. Beijing promises to Minsk and Kiev cheap credit and a great investment, writes the weekly "Kommersant-Vlast." Beijing has allocated Minsk soft loan of $ 1 billion and $ 11 million in grants. In addition, the Minsk and Beijing signed a document that lays the foundation for further Chinese investments into the Belarusian economy. However, Belarus is not the only country on the western borders of the CIS that China attaches great importance. In June, President Hu Jintao visited Ukraine and signed with President Viktor Yanukovych a declaration, according to which Kiev has officially become a strategic partner of Beijing. In the course of the visit contracts worth $2 billion were signed. According to Chinese diplomats, investments in Ukraine and Belarus are part of long-term strategy of China. Experts believe that there is a longer-term geopolitical calculations associated with the expansion of its influence in Eastern Europe in China's policy.
Russia-China-Iran - Unofficial sources have announced that Iran, Russia, and China are currently holding talks on a proposal to establish a joint missile defense shield as a counterweight to a NATO defense shield, according to a recent report. The report, which was published in the Iranian daily newspaper Kayhan, said that the sources cited two reasons why serious consultations have been held on the initiative. First, all three states have come to the conclusion that U.S. officials’ assertion that their concern over the alleged missile and nuclear capabilities of Iran and North Korea is the reason for the decision to establish a NATO missile defense shield is just a pretext and the true objective of the shield is to threaten Russia and China.
In addition, now that the proposal to establish an early warning radar system in southeast Turkey, which is one component of the NATO missile defense shield, appears to be a done deal, the U.S. is now planning to establish other components of the new system in South Korea and Taiwan, which clearly shows that Washington is using the alleged threat from Iran and North Korea as a pretext to target China and Russia.
China-Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan and China plan to double bilateral trade by 2015, said the chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress of China Wu Bangguo. "Currently, friendship and economic cooperation between our two countries have reached a strategic level. China is one of the main economic partners of Kazakhstan. Last year, our bilateral trade exceeded $ 20 billion. We plan to increase it up to $ 40 billion by 2015 " - Wu Bangguo said after a meeting with the chairman of the Kazakh Senate Kairat Mami.
Meanwhile, Chinese oil refineries will process Kazakh crude in a deal under negotiation that will lessen Astana’s reliance on Russia for refined oils, a top Kazakh minister revealed Monday. "In order to reduce our dependence on Russia, we are agreeing on tolling [third-party processing], including with Chinese refineries," the Reuters news agency reported Oil and Gas Minister Sauat Mynbayev as saying at a government meeting in the capital. Kazakhstan hopes to supply between 1 million and 1.5 million tons of oil to China’s Dushanzi refinery, located in the western Xinjiang region.
China-Turkmenistan - The President of Turkmenistan Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov held talks with member of the State Council, Minister of Public Security of China Meng Jianzhu and Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of China Cheng Guoping. "It was noted that Turkmenistan and China are in favor of building a business partnership, not only in the oil and gas sector, but also in transportation, chemical, construction areas, textile, food industry, etc."- said the press service Berdimuhamedov. eng Jianzhu said that the security situation in Central Asia is tense and invited both parties to strengthen the fight against "three evil forces" and to deepen bilateral and multilateral security cooperation. In turn, the head of Turkmenistan assured the Chinese side that Ashgabat is ready to strengthen cooperation with China in fighting "three evil forces" and work together to protect the security of both countries, as well as peace and stability in the region.
The Turkmenistan - China gas pipeline "plays an important role in ensuring the economic and energy security of both China and Turkmenistan," said to press Xiao Qinghua, China's ambassador in Ashgabat. The message is timed to celebrate on Saturday the 62th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China. The Chinese diplomat said that "with the direct support and attention of President Hu Jintao and Turkmen President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov the oil and gas cooperation has been carried out successfully."
US-Uzbekistan - U.S. President Barack Obama spoke by telephone with his Uzbek counterpart Islam Karimov on stepping up Uzbek involvement in the U.S.’ military ‘Northern Distribution Network’ supply route into neighboring Afghanistan. The two leaders agreed on the need for a “secure and prosperous” Afghanistan. In the meantime, the U.S. Congress is discussing a new law that would authorize the Pentagon to give military aid to Uzbekistan. The new U.S. diplomatic strategy comes in the wake of a crisis in diplomatic relations between the United States and Pakistan that has raised worries over Washington’s major supply route to Afghanistan, which relies heavily on Pakistani support.
Kazakhstan-Afghanistan - Kazakhstani-Afghan deals signed September 27 reflect growing ties between the countries, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) reported September 28. Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Kazakhstani Emergency Situations Minister Vladimir Karpovich signed trade, education, mining and transport agreements. Kazakhstan plans soon to export 500,000 tonnes of wheat to Afghanistan, Afghan Commerce Minister Anwar Ahadi said. Workers soon will finish a Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan-Afghanistan railway, and commercial nonstop flights between Kazakhstan and Afghanistan are scheduled to start next year.
Articles referred to in this post:
"Россия и Китай согласовали формулу цены на газ" (Russia and China have agreed on a price formula for gas)
"Позиции России в энергетике КНР слабеют" (Russia's position in China's energy plan weakened)
"Белорусская площадка готова для китайской экспансии" (Belarusian market is ready for Chinese expansion)
"Китай отбивает у России самое дорогое" (China is winning the most valuable over from russia)
"Россия, Иран и Китай создают совместную ПРО" (Russia, Iran and China building a joint missile defense)
"Китай и Казахстан - добрые соседи и стратегические партнеры - генконсул КНР в Алматы" (China and Kazakhstan - good neighbors and strategic partners - Consul General of China in Almaty)
"Казахстан и Китай планируют к 2015 году удвоить двусторонний торговый оборот" (Kazakhstan and China plan to double bilateral trade by 2015)
"Kazakhstan looks to China for oil refining"
"Китай предложил Туркмении усилить борьбу с 'тремя силами зла'" (China suggested Turkmenistan to strengthen the fight against "three evil forces")
"Туркменский газ обеспечивает энергобезопасность Китая - посол КНР" (Turkmen gas ensures China's energy security - China's ambassador)
"США вошли в положение Узбекистана" (United States entered Uzbekistan)
"Казахи, афганцы сближаются" (Kazakhs, Afghans getting closer)
Serbia
Head of Serbia’s negotiation team Borislav Stefanović criticized the opposition parties and their alleged purposeful political impediment to finding a political solution for the situation in Kosovo. The truth, said Stefavonić, is that Belgrade sends mixed messages to its citizens in Kosovo thereby worsening the situation there. It appears that the Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS) obstructs the government’s efficiency and in fact actively pursues a governmental collapse so as to reap the benefits from such an occurrence in the upcoming 2012 elections. This he told Aleksandar Vučić, deputy president for Serbia’s Progressive Party (SNS), during a program on the news outlet B92 adding that Serbia has achieved more on the political front than it has over the past ten years regarding the agreement on trade and goods. While Stefanović and Vučić agreed that Serbia ought to obtain as much as possible within the process of finding a solution for Kosovo, they disagreed on other issues. According to Vučić, there have been no viable solutions proposed for the Serbs that reside in Kosovo while a partition of Kosovo is unacceptable.
Meanwhile, Tomislav Nikolić, head of SNS is already getting ready for the upcoming elections. He pledged to construct an enormous industrial zone that was to be built on the Danube and stretch from Novi Sad all the way to Belgrade. Nikolić stated that he seeks to realize the 70 year old dream by which ships, especially German ones, could travel on the Danube thereby shortening their travel time. This he pledged in addition to the construction of seven hydroelectric plants. Nikolić added that the current government promised its citizens 200,000 jobs while in reality, 250,000 jobs were lost since its inception.
“Nikolić: Dva projekta od 100 milijardi evra ako SNS pobedi”. Ekonom East Group. accessed September 28, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/165035.html
“Stefanović: Deo opozicije želi kolaps državne politike”. Ekonom East Group. accessed September 26, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/164847.html
Serbia and Kosovo
Serbian protestors clashed with KFOR and EULEX staff on the Jarinje crossing on the 27th of September. The incident transpired as KFOR and EULEX staff initiated the removal of the illegally placed roadblocks erected by Serb citizens. As a result, Serbs threw rocks at the international forces to which KFOR and EULEX reacted by shooting ‘rubber bullets’ and teargas at the protestors. According to EMG, six protesters were brought to the hospital in Priština while four KFOR soldiers were wounded due to an improvised explosive device. President Tadić meanwhile urged all three sides including the Serbs, KFOR and EULEX missions as well as Albanian citizens to quiescence as diplomatic means pose the only viable solution to resolving the current instability in northern Kosovo. State secretary for KiM Oliver Ivanović echoed Tadić’s words asking, however, that KFOR withdraw from the barricades. Ivanović criticized the KFOR for shooting at “peaceful citizens” with ‘live ammunition’ adding that such an incident had not happened since eleven years when KFOR commenced its mission in Kosovo. Ivica Dačić too voiced his criticism stating that the conflict between Serbs and KFOR was a “big shame” for the international community adding that Serbia seeks to obtain a precise position of the international mission in Kosovo. The reason as to why violence was used against people who protest peacefully on the day when Belgrade was to continue its dialog with Brussels is questionable added Dačić while asserting that Serbia is committed to continuing the peace process regarding Kosovo.
Milovoj Mihajlović, head of media relations, stated that it will be more difficult to control the situation in northern Kosovo after incidents of the preceding days. Mihajlović asserted that the main struggle was not held on the roadblocks. Instead, they are being fought in New York and Brussels were Priština’s main goal was to weaken the position of Serbia. France and Berlin meanwhile criticized Serbia and its citizens stating that violence against KFOR forces was unacceptable. The sharpest statement of criticism, according to EMG, came out of Priština in which it is asserted that violent reactions against KFOR troops is carried out by those people who do not care for law and order and instead identify with criminal structures, illegal trafficking and the organized crime.
On the Jarinje and Brnjak crossings, Serbian citizens are getting ready for the winter on the barricades. Head of the Kosovske Mitrovice administrative district Radenko Nedeljković stated that with regard to the Jarinje and Brnjank border crossings, Serbs seek that the situation go back to the pre July 25th status. In addition, representatives of the northern Kosovo municipalities have asked the international community to conduct an independent and comprehensive investigation so as to find out what really happened at the Jarinje crossing. Slaviša Ristić, mayor of Zubin Potok, stated that citizens residing within his municipality will request to swap EULEX forces with representatives of UNMIK. Mihajlovic, however, assured that the presence of the EULEX mission is a guarantor for the wellbeing of Serb citizens in northern Kosovo. EULEX, he said further, is part of the UN adding that EULEX might not be neutral in all situations but that it is up to Serbia to change this situation.
“Mihajlović: Euleks mora da ostane”. B92. accessed October 1, 2011. www.B92.net/info/vesti/index/php?yyyy=2011&mm=10&dd=01&nav_category=640&nav_id=546072
“Spremni za zimu na barikadama”. B92. accessed October 2, 2011. www.B92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2011&mm=10&dd=02&nav_category=640&nav_id=546306
“Vlada: Sad je teže održavati mirnu situaciju”. Ekonom East Group. accessed September 28, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/164990.html
“Najmanje 10 povređenih u sukobima na Jarinju”. Ekonom East Group. accessed September 27, 2011. www.emg.rs/vesti/srbija/164916.html
“Vier KFOR-Soldaten durch Sprengsatz verletzt”. Stern.de. accessed September 27, 2011. www.stern.de/politik/ausland/kosovo-grenzuebergang-vier-soldaten-durch-sprengsatz-verletzt-1732772.html
Sandžak on the Kosovo situation
Regarding the question as to how to resolve the situation in Kosovo, the Democratic Party of Sandžak has put forward a proposal which includes that political elites, Kosovars and Serbs grasp the reality caused by the incidents following 1999 and that subsequent changes be altered in Serbia’s constitution. The Serb institutions which, according to the Democratic Party of Sandžak, consist of Milošević’s secret service, are to disbanded immediately while the Ahtisaari plan was to be consulted given that it poses a good option regarding the protection of the Serb population and its cultural heritage. Further points include the discontinuance of animosities between Albanian and Serbian peoples under the stipulation that both sides establish the best neighborly relations possible while Serbs living in northern Kosovo should be given autonomy.
“Stav Bošnjačke demokratske stranke Sandžaka: regionalna autonomija za severa Kosova”. Politika Online. accessed October 2, 2011. www.politika.rs/rubrike/Politika/Stav-Bosnjacke-democratske-stranke-Sandzaka-regionalna-autonomija-za-severa-Kosova.lt.html.
Sandžak
Education is a crucial factor when seeking to construct a national identity and inheritance thereof, according to Zehnija Bulić. While the success of a nation is based on scientific and professional advancement, the compulsory contents such as the teachings of national literature, language, music, history and geography are pillars that make up a nation in the first place. Bosniaks that reside in Serbia, however, have only the Bosnian language from all the above named while the Bosnian language is only an elective. The reason for this is that the Bosnian minority council chose, out of three, the above mentioned option. Other options included that Bosnian be tough as a compulsory subject while the other option was to study the two languages, Serbian and Bosnian, side by side as an equally compulsory subject. Why then, the author asks has the council chosen that Bosnian be taught at schools only as an elective subject. Children of Serbian and Bosnian backgrounds are thus at a disadvantage regarding the development of their national identity and behind Hungarian and Slovakian children who have that option, assures Bulić.
“Izborni i postizborni predmeti”. Sandžak Press. accessed September 29, 2011. sandzakpress.net/izborni-ipostizborni-predmeti