Friday, October 4, 2013

Forced Labor in the Uzbek Cotton Harvest

                Uzbekistan has one of the poorest records in the region on addressing human trafficking. The US State Department’s Trafficking in Persons Report 2013 states that due to a lack of “significant efforts to comply” with the minimum standards set forth in the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, passed by the US Congress in 2000, Uzbekistan has been recently downgraded to the lowest tier, three, after being on the tier two watch list for the last six years (Russia was also recently downgraded for the same reason). Within this report, it is also mentioned that “the Government of Uzbekistan remains one of only a handful of governments around the world that subjects its citizens to forced labor through implementation of state policy.” However, the government of Uzbekistan denies that forced labor exists in the country. I found this very interesting and pursued it further.[1]

                The International Labor Organization defines forced labor as “work or service exacted from a person under threat or penalty, which includes penal sanctions and the loss of rights and privileges, where the person has not offered him/herself voluntarily.”[2] In Uzbekistan the issue is centered on the cotton harvest. The Uzbek economy is heavily dependent on cotton, and has its roots in the mid-1800s with attempts by the Russian Empire to develop a source of cotton not dependent on the United States. While Tashkent has attempted to diversify crops since independence, agriculture is still focused on cotton production. Uzbekistan is currently the world's fifth largest cotton exporter and sixth largest producer.[3] Agriculture itself provides employment for around one-third of overall employment.[4]

Several factors have been attributed to the current reliance on forced labor during the cotton harvest. Critically, there is a limited window that farmers have to harvest their crop, generally from September through October. To bring in the harvest farmers have also had to deal with the “demechanization” of the harvest in Uzbekistan that has resulted in a heavy reliance on manual labor. Moreover, this reliance is constrained by the increase in labor out-migration to countries such as Russia. However, the main driver has been the structure of the national economy and direct involvement of the government. The Uzbek government, “despite a number of high-profile reforms”, has continued a command economy approach reminiscent of the Soviet-era. Quotas are established and demanded of cotton farmers and prices are set artificially low for the cotton produced. Prices have been historically set below the world market price, making it difficult for farmers to attract labor with decent pay.[5]

The government’s precise role in cotton production is murky. Uzbek farmers are required to sell their quota to a state-controlled company (Uzkhlopkoprom) that operates all of Uzbekistan's cotton gins. Uzkhlopkoprom itself is 51 percent owned by the national government; however, the owners of the remaining 49 percent are officially unknown but “investigative reports by journalists and human rights groups suggest the privately held shares are controlled by [President] Karimov's political allies and their relatives.”[6]

The lack of harvest machinery is also relatively puzzling. A teacher from the Karauzyak district was quoted exclaiming, “In the Soviet Union our kolkhoz was among the leaders by machine collection, 80 percent of the harvest was collected by machines. Now there is not a single combine in entire Karakalpakstan!”[7] A 35 percent drop in cotton production since 1991 could be attributed to a lack of modern agriculture machinery.[8] In 2005, the Uzbek Agriculture Ministry stated that 10 percent of the harvest that year had been collected by combines, which was down from 20 percent in 2000. Sources quote farmers who claim that there is a large shortage of agricultural machinery, such as tractors and combines. This may be due to a significant drop in production, from 35,000 to 2,000 tractors per year in 2007, at the Soviet-era Tashkent Tractor Plant and Tashkent Agricultural Vehicles Plant.[9] In 2009 the government started a program to reequip several agricultural machinery production plants, but machinery still remains hard to come by. Even if machinery is located, fuel and repairs can be prohibitively expensive for many farmers. [10]

Internationally, there has been push back against the forced labor of children in Uzbekistan. The issue of child labor in the cotton harvest has not been limited to Uzbekistan. It has also been widely reported in Tajikistan, but appears to not take precedence over schooling there.[11] Intense lobbying by international NGO’s led to 25 Western retail companies boycotting the use of Uzbek cotton in 2010. In response, a decree was issued by the Uzbek government for the 2012 cotton harvest that banned school children up to 15 years of age being used as labor. The government has also made the argument that “cotton picking was in the context of family farms, and as such did not count as child labor but was in line with generally recognized family values and traditions of Uzbek society that supported the participation of elder children in creating the family well-being.”[12] A UNICEF report on the 2012 harvest confirmed that children under the age of 15 were not seen picking cotton.[13] However, additional reports claim that the government has pushed for greater participation from other age groups to fill the gap.[14]

The labor shortage has led to increased demand for participation across many sectors of the Uzbek economy. An estimated “16% of all government employees, including doctors, nurses and other essential service providers” and “60% of educators from each school were sent out of the classrooms to pick cotton.”[15] Additional reports describe instances where “bus and city shuttle passengers heading out of town have been redirected to the fields. Public transport drivers say that buses and city shuttles leaving Tashkent are often “rolled off” to the cotton fields.”[16] Even the military has not been spared, “These days the soldiers in the fields of Kasan district pick cotton” and “the soldiers of the Termez unit also work in cotton fields.”[17] It is possible for civilians called up to exempt themselves by paying for the daily quota they would have been expected to pick, or by paying another to take their spot. 2012-2013 prices have ranged from 12,000 Uzbekistani soms ($5.50) for a daily quota, to 250,000 ($116) for a doctor in Jizzakh to buy a full exemption or 500,000 soms ($232) for a teacher to pay another to take 25 days of assigned duty. A significant cost for workers whose pay “does not often go above 12,000 per day.”[18]

These workers are ‘forced’ to participate through several methods. Provincial mayors and governors are held personally responsible for meeting quota requirements in their districts, and they in turn pressure local officials to organize labor in the fields. [19] Arrangements are made between farmers and schools to get children over the age of 15 and college students into the fields. A “call to patriotic duty, peer pressure, visits to families” are used, but if necessary they have “punitive measures” available. Payment is then made to the school directly, who disburses it to the students.[20] There are a few reports of residents being forced to pick cotton without receiving compensation, albeit low, but this appears to be atypical. Punitive measures are reported to be threats to take away electricity, retirement payments, childcare benefits, or even employment. [21] To monitor participation it appears that passport numbers, official residence registration details, phone numbers and a photograph are collected by officials. [22] In the fields, there have even been reports of men in military uniforms acting as “supervisors” to ensure quotas are met. [23]






[1] US State Department, Trafficking in Persons Report 2013, available at: http://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2013/
[2] Ruwanpara, Kanchana and Pallavi Rai. 2004. Forced Labor: Definitions, Indicators and Measurements. International Labor Organization, Geneva. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---declaration/documents/publication/wcms_081991.pdf
[3] CIA World Factbook. 2013. Central Intelligence Agency. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/uz.html
[4] School of Oriental and Asian Studies, University of London. 2010. What Has Changed? Progress in Eliminating the Use of Forced Child Labour in the Cotton Harvests of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Centre for Contemporary Central Asia and the Caucasus, University of London. Available at: http://www.cottoncampaign.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/2011_SOAS_WhatHasChanges.pdf
[5] Ibid; Trafficking in Persons Report 2013
[6] Synovitz, Ron. 2013. For Exploited Uzbek Farmers, High Cotton Prices Only Enrich Overlords. RFE/RL. Available at:
[7] Ferghana News. 2009. Uzbekistan: News from the Fields. Ferghana News Information Agency. Available at: http://enews.fergananews.com/articles/2581
[8] CIA World Factbook
[9] UZNews. 2007. Uzbek Cotton Industry Based on Manual Labor. UZNews.net. Available at: http://www.uznews.net/news_single.php?lng=en&sub=&cid=2&nid=2226
[10] UZNews. 2007. Uzbekistan to Revive Production of Outdated Cotton Combines. UZNews.net. Available at: http://www.uznews.net/news_single.php?lng=en&cid=2&nid=11831
[11] School of Oriental and Asian Studies, University of London, 2010.
[12] Ibid.
[13] UZNews. 2013. UNICEF Did Not See Children Picking Cotton in Uzbekistan. UZNews.net. Available at: http://www.uznews.net/news_single.php?lng=en&cid=30&nid=23900
[14] Ferghana News. 2012. Uzbekistan: Parents Sent to the Cotton Fields Instead of their Children. Ferghana News Information Agency. Available at: http://enews.fergananews.com/articles/2776
[15]Ferghana News Information Agency. Available at: http://enews.fergananews.com/articles/2805
[16] Ferghana News. 2012. Uzbekistan: Parents Sent to the Cotton Fields Instead of their Children
[17] Ferghana News. 2009. Uzbekistan: News from the Fields
[18]Ferghana News. 2012. Uzbekistan: Parents Sent to the Cotton Fields Instead of their Children; [18] UZNews. 2013. Cotton Pickers in Angren on the Fields with a Badge. UZNews.net. Available at: http://www.uznews.net/news_single.php?lng=en&cid=2&nid=23810; UZNews. 2013. Doctors, Artists and Railway Workers – All are Cotton Pickers in Jizzakh Province. UZNews.net. Available at: http://www.uznews.net/news_single.php?lng=en&cid=2&nid=23937
[19] Trafficking in Persons Report 2013
[20] School of Oriental and Asian Studies, University of London, 2010.
[21] UZNews. 2013. Residents in Zaaminskiy Forced to Pick Cotton for Free. UZNews.net. Available at: http://www.uznews.net/news_single.php?lng=en&cid=2&nid=23795
[22] UZNews. 2013. Cotton Pickers in Angren on the Fields with a Badge.
[23] Ferghana News. 2012. Uzbekistan: Parents Sent to the Cotton Fields Instead of their Children


No comments:

Post a Comment